Tiger In Trouble

Tiger Woods at a game with daughter and wife, Elin.

Tiger Woods is probably the most powerful athlete celebrity endorser and his image has worked effectively in ads up until this point, except perhaps his mismatched endorsement for Buick. Nike alone used Woods to create Nike Golf, one of the fastest growing brands in the industry and manufacturing golf balls that Tiger Woods himself used in the U.S. Open, British Open, and PGA Championship (Belch 175). Now, Tiger Woods is at risk for losing his lucrative endorsements due to the exposure of his affair. After a car accident last week, the media delved into Tiger's life, which led to his ultimate confession of an affair, which is backed up with the evidence of over 300 text messages between him and his mistress. According to PR experts:

Woods sponsorship and endorsement deals include Gatorade, Accenture, AT&T, EA Sports, Gillette, Nike and NetJets. Thus far Woods’ sponsors have not commented on his status with them. However, Bank of America said it will continue its talks about taking on a broader role with the Tiger Woods Foundation.

You Better Not Lie, I'm Telling You Why...

Starting December 1st, 2009, the Federal Trade Commission is going to hold advertisers accountable to the content of their testimonials. According to Ad Age, testimonials from celebrity endorsers can't just say "results not typical." Instead, the endorser must report precisely how effective the product will be. For example, for products that aid in losing weight, promoting hair growth or reducing acne, the company is required to disclose how effectively the product works for the average user. Jared may have lost sixty pounds eating Subway sandwiches, but does the average Subway consumer typically lose that much? Probably not.

I think that this is an interesting proposition because many ads and their celebrity endorsers may lose their persuasive power if the products are portrayed to produce realistic, rather than dramatic results. Would women have signed up for Jenny Craig, for example, if they had known beforehand that they couldn't lose the same weight that Kirstie Alley did on that food and fitness plan? When a celebrity sells, he/she is usually selling a product that implies access to flawless beauty, untouchable popularity and quick resolutions to big problems. Will the endorsement have the same effect if the celebrity plainly says: "This Neutrogena product only clears the skin of 50 percent of those who use it" or "This weight loss plan only guarantees the average individual to lose up to 15 pounds," will consumers still feel compelled to buy? Aside from this, I think that the FTC plan definitely seems to answer our timeless question: Does the celebrity really use that product and to get those results?

In addition to this, the FTC mandates that companies are much more truthful about those who are secretly promoting their products, especially on blogs. There are so many people (including celebrities) who are speaking highly of certain products, but these "word of mouth" testimonials are actually being propelled by the company, not by product users who are sharing positive comments on their own free will. For example, we know that Tiger Woods starred in Buick ads, but if he happens to mention how much he loves his new Rolex on Twitter, then he has to be clear that he's an endorser for Rolex. I think this is a good policy. And perhaps I can now understand why Burger King makes their endorsers take live lie-detector tests.

Celebrity for a Cause

This week, Bono spoke at the Tory or Conservative Party conference in the U.K. The opinion article, entitled, "Why do politicians--including sadly, the Tories this week--fawn over Bono, a smug hypocritical, whining, tax dodging mounteback?" is rather humorous as Quentin Letts questions Bono's record number of public appearances and his peculiar involvement in political life. Over the years, it seems as though Bono has mastered the ability to skillfully maneuver the complications of partisan politics and put himself into good graces of George W. Bush, Obama, Nelson Mandela, Tony Blair...

Aside from absolutely taunting Bono and his political activism, the article brings up an interesting point. Celebrity endorsements are usually constructed with the desire to sell something. However, do these powerful political figures really need Bono as a selling point? Does Bono put himself in the spotlight to promote himself and his own music? Two years ago, Bono was one of the stars who worked to promote the RED campaign.

This brings about another dimension of celebrity endorsements. Yes, celebrities offer a face to a cause, whether it be political or philanthropic, but does it bring a great deal of rewards to the celebrity as well? Many celebrities are well known for the causes they promote. According to a BRANDWEEK survey, individuals were able to most easily recall Lance Armstrong's battle with cancer and his LiveStrong campaign, while others were familiar with the works of Brangelina. Brad Pitt helped rebuild after Hurricane Katrina, while Angelina Jolie is well known for her work with UNICEF. Other top celebrity causes include: Tiger Woods (The Tiger Woods Learning Center/Foundation), Bill Gates (for various causes), Al Gore (global warming), George Clooney (Darfur), Michael J. Fox (Parkinson's disease) and Peyton Manning (PeyBack Foundation).

I think that celebrity associations with causes are almost as common as celebrity presence in ads. In fact, the other day, I just saw Gwyneth Paltrow in a public service announcement, in which she calls upon viewers to volunteer in their community. In the ad, Paltrow says, "The biggest blessing in life is to realise your personal power. Community work brings families closer together. Doing good for others, doing positive action always comes back around and enriches your life. It's the biggest gift you could give yourself. Please join us in volunteering."

What does this all mean? I think that if the celebrity is promoting a good cause, then they automatically reap the benefits of possessing an image as a philanthropist (ie. Brangelina), but this might backfire as this is a rather transparent approach (which may have evoked such criticism of Bono in the opinion piece). It seems as though most people agree with this: 68.8% would only commit to the cause if the celebrity had been personally affected by the cause they were promoting. This must mean that celebrities endorsements for causes certainly help their image, but only to a certain point. That's right celebrities, we know what you're up to!

Popular Celebrity Endorsements

Desperate Housewives Star Eva Longoria for Bebe Sport

Madonna's ad for her clothing line at H&M

President Obama and his daughter (left)

have an intentional resemblance to the

father & daughter in this

Tropicana Ad from January 2009 (right)

Hayden Panettiere for the Got Milk? Campaign

High School Musical Star Vanessa Hudgens

for Ecko Red Sneakers

George Clooney for OMEGA Watches

Tiger Woods for a 2007 Buick Enclave